American River College Integrated Planning System Reports
2021 Disproportionate Impact for Art Overall Drop Rate Metric (F18-S21)
The following is intended to provide an overview of where disproportionate impact (DI) exists in the Drop Rates (% W notations) of different racial/ethnic groups within your planning unit. Greater detail can be found in the Department DI Detail Spreadsheets which are available for each of the course designators in your department
(ART, ARTH, ARTPH).
These nine-tab spreadsheets show your DI data at the department and course level, disaggregated by race, gender, and gender within race. (To protect the identity of faculty, DI statistics are provided only for courses that have been taught by at least three faculty members during the three years we merge for these reports. An unrestricted report may be obtained if all of a planning unit’s faculty are agreeable, and doing so typically results in DI data being reported for additional courses beyond those shown in the restricted version of the reports.)
Please refer to ARC’s DI Interpretation Guide for assistance in understanding and differentiating between ARC’s two DI reports (the web-based report shown here and the Dept DI Detail Spreadsheet(s), linked above)
Course
African/ American
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic/ Latino
Multi- Race
Native/ American
Other/ Non-White
Pacific/ Islander
White
Unknown
ART 101
ART 300
ART 302
ART 304
ART 305
ART 306
ART 314
ART 320
ART 323
ART 324
ART 327
ART 328
ART 329
ART 336
ART 337
ART 361
ART 370
ART 372
ART 375
ART 376
ART 390
ART 391
ART 397
ART 398
ART 420
ART 440
ART 442
ART 443
ART 444
ART 445
ART 495
ART 498
ARTH 300
ARTH 302
ARTH 308
ARTH 310
ARTH 318
ARTH 322
ARTH 333
ARTH 334
ARTH 335
ARTPH 300
ARTPH 302
ARTPH 305
ARTPH 306
ARTPH 310
ARTPH 315
ARTPH 322
ARTPH 340
ARTPH 345
ARTPH 350
ARTPH 360
ARTPH 361
ARTPH 370
ARTPH 375
ARTPH 376
ARTPH 498
The Disproportionate Impact methodology shown here reflects the four different methodologies recommended by the State Chancellor's Office,
including the most recent, the Percentage Point Gap Methodology with Margin of Error. Applied to the success rates of the courses your unit has offered over
the last three years, the above table shows the following:
Groups with success rates showing Definite DI
Groups with success rates showing Potential DI (rates within 3 points of the group’s DI threshold)
Groups with success rates that may possibly have DI, but for which too little data exists to be sure (<10)
Groups with success rates showing No Measurable DI