American River College Integrated Planning System Reports
2021 Disproportionate Impact for Music Overall Drop Rate Metric (F18-S21)
The following is intended to provide an overview of where disproportionate impact (DI) exists in the Drop Rates (% W notations) of different racial/ethnic groups within your planning unit. Greater detail can be found in the Department DI Detail Spreadsheets which are available for each of the course designators in your department
(MUFHL, MUIVI, MUP, MUSM).
These nine-tab spreadsheets show your DI data at the department and course level, disaggregated by race, gender, and gender within race. (To protect the identity of faculty, DI statistics are provided only for courses that have been taught by at least three faculty members during the three years we merge for these reports. An unrestricted report may be obtained if all of a planning unit’s faculty are agreeable, and doing so typically results in DI data being reported for additional courses beyond those shown in the restricted version of the reports.)
Please refer to ARC’s DI Interpretation Guide for assistance in understanding and differentiating between ARC’s two DI reports (the web-based report shown here and the Dept DI Detail Spreadsheet(s), linked above)
Course
African/ American
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic/ Latino
Multi- Race
Native/ American
Other/ Non-White
Pacific/ Islander
White
Unknown
MUFHL 300
MUFHL 308
MUFHL 310
MUFHL 311
MUFHL 315
MUFHL 321
MUFHL 330
MUFHL 400
MUFHL 401
MUFHL 410
MUFHL 411
MUFHL 420
MUFHL 421
MUIVI 200
MUIVI 298
MUIVI 310
MUIVI 311
MUIVI 320
MUIVI 321
MUIVI 340
MUIVI 341
MUIVI 350
MUIVI 385
MUIVI 386
MUIVI 390
MUIVI 391
MUIVI 400
MUIVI 401
MUIVI 411
MUIVI 420
MUIVI 421
MUIVI 422
MUIVI 423
MUIVI 425
MUIVI 426
MUIVI 498
MUP 310
MUP 311
MUP 320
MUP 321
MUP 323
MUP 324
MUP 327
MUP 328
MUP 330
MUP 331
MUP 340
MUP 341
MUP 350
MUP 352
MUP 360
MUP 361
MUP 370
MUP 400
MUP 401
MUP 420
MUSM 110
MUSM 111
MUSM 112
MUSM 113
MUSM 120
MUSM 121
MUSM 140
MUSM 295
MUSM 334
MUSM 342
MUSM 344
MUSM 350
MUSM 352
MUSM 356
MUSM 357
MUSM 495
The Disproportionate Impact methodology shown here reflects the four different methodologies recommended by the State Chancellor's Office,
including the most recent, the Percentage Point Gap Methodology with Margin of Error. Applied to the success rates of the courses your unit has offered over
the last three years, the above table shows the following:
Groups with success rates showing Definite DI
Groups with success rates showing Potential DI (rates within 3 points of the group’s DI threshold)
Groups with success rates that may possibly have DI, but for which too little data exists to be sure (<10)
Groups with success rates showing No Measurable DI