Skip to Content

American River College Integrated Planning System Reports

2018 Disproportionate Impact for History Overall
A_B Rate Metric (F15-S18)

The following is intended to provide an overview of where disproportionate impact (DI) exists in the A-B Rates (% A,B grades) of different racial/ethnic groups within your planning unit. Greater detail can be found in the Department DI Detail Spreadsheets which are available for each of the course designators in your department (HIST). These nine-tab spreadsheets show your DI data at the department and course level, disaggregated by race, gender, and gender within race. (To protect the identity of faculty, DI statistics are provided only for courses that have been taught by at least three faculty members during the three years we merge for these reports. An unrestricted report may be obtained if all of a planning unit’s faculty are agreeable, and doing so typically results in DI data being reported for additional courses beyond those shown in the restricted version of the reports.)

Please refer to ARC’s DI Interpretation Guide for assistance in understanding and differentiating between ARC’s two DI reports (the web-based report shown here and the Dept DI Detail Spreadsheet(s), linked above)

Course African/
American
Asian Filipino Hispanic/
Latino
Multi-
Race
Native/
American
Other/
Non-White
Pacific/
Islander
White Unknown
HIST 300 red green red red red yellow yellow red red red
HIST 302 red lightred P lightred P red lightred P yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 305 yellow yellow yellow green yellow yellow yellow yellow red yellow
HIST 307 red lightred P red red red yellow yellow red green green
HIST 308 red green red red red yellow yellow green green red
HIST 310 red green green red green red green red green green
HIST 311 red green green lightred P green red yellow lightred P green green
HIST 318 yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 320 red yellow yellow red red yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 321 red yellow yellow red red yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 323 red yellow yellow green red yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 325 yellow red green red red yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 327 yellow yellow yellow red yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 330 red green green red lightred P red lightred P red green green
HIST 340 red yellow yellow green yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 341 red red yellow red green yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 364 yellow red yellow red yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 365 yellow yellow yellow lightred P yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 367 yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 373 yellow yellow yellow green yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 374 yellow yellow yellow green yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow
HIST 375 yellow yellow yellow lightred P yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow
HIST 480 yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow
HIST 481 yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 483 yellow yellow yellow green yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
HIST 484 yellow yellow yellow green yellow yellow yellow yellow red yellow

The Disproportionate Impact methodology shown here reflects the four different methodologies recommended by the State Chancellor's Office, including the most recent, the Percentage Point Gap Methodology with Margin of Error. Applied to the success rates of the courses your unit has offered over the last three years, the above table shows the following:

  • red     Groups with success rates showing Definite DI
  • lightred P     Groups with success rates showing Potential DI (rates within 3 points of the group’s DI threshold)
  • yellow     Groups with success rates that may possibly have DI, but for which too little data exists to be sure (<10)
  • green     Groups with success rates showing No Measurable DI

Download PDF