Skip to Content

American River College Integrated Planning System Reports

What are Department Set Standards and Stretch Goals?

Department Set Standards (DSS) and Stretch Goals are statistical criteria used to detect if a decline or an increase in course success rates has occurred for the department as a whole for the most recent academic year compared to the preceding 3 year average (See Figure 1. below). Falling below the Department Set Standard indicates a statistically significant decline in course success rates has occurred. By contrast, scoring above the stretch goal indicates a statistically significant increase in course success rates has occurred. Finally, scoring in between the Department Set Standard and the Stretch Goal indicates that no statistically significant changes have occurred.

Note: This process does NOT include "department to department" or "department to college" comparisons.

Figure 1. 95% Confidence Interval centered around the Average (M) of the preceding 3 years

Why are we being asked to review and report on Department Set Standards and Stretch Goals?

Reviewing current year results against Department Set Standards (minimum standards) and Stretch Goals (aspirational goals) may be useful in promoting and informing departmental dialogue, planning, decision making, and resource allocation.

In addition, ACCJC standards requires colleges to demonstrate that results are reviewed against these set standards and stretch goals. The process for setting standards and stretch goals was reviewed by the Academic Senate (in 2016 for Department Set Standards, in 2018 for Stretch Goals).

Computer Information Science

Discipline Year 1 - (2018 - 2019) Year 2 - (2019 - 2020) Year 3 - (2020 - 2021) 3 Year Average Department Set Standard and Stretch Goal Based on Prior 3 Years Target Year - 2021 - 2022 Meets Department Set Standard?
Computer Information Science 69.2% (N=5613) 63.2% (N=5269) 67.4% (N=4622) 66.60% 58.9% - 74.3% * 66.2% (N=4136) Yes

Success Rate Percentage

# of A, B, C, Cr, P grades expressed as a % of total grade notations (includes W's but only those occurring after the Drop-No-W Date).

Enrollment (N)

Count of total enrollments (e.g., a student taking five classes is counted five times).

*The Department Set Standard is computed using the department's own course success rates over the previous 3 years (excluding summers). Specifically, A 95% Confidence Interval is constructed around the department's average course success rates over the previous 3 years. The Lower Limit of this Confidence Interval is then used as the Department Set Standard (assumes a t distribution with 2 degrees of freedom (average - (Standard Error * 4.303))). This methodology ensures that falling below the standard is unlikely to occur due simply to random year to year variation but instead is likely to reflect an actual decrease in course success rates for the target year. Stretch goals are computed utilizing the same methodology, but utilizes the Upper Limit of the Confidence Interval (assumes a t distribution with 2 degrees of freedom (average + (Standard Error * 4.303))). Exceeding the stretch goal is likely to reflect an actual increase in course success rates for the target year. Note: Due to methodological limitations, it is possible for the calculated stretch goal to sometimes exceed 100% in cases where there is large variability in course success rates over the previous three years. In such cases, the planning unit is encouraged to set its own internal stretch (aspirational) goals.

Summer semester data are typically excluded due to a variety of factors (e.g., proportion of university students) which differentiate these students from the traditional fall and spring student populations.

[As per the faculty contract, course success rate data should in no way be used as a part of Faculty Peer Review.]

Course Year 1 - (2018 - 2019) Year 2 - (2019 - 2020) Year 3 - (2020 - 2021) 3 Year Average Department Set Standard and Stretch Goal Based on Prior 3 Years Target Year - 2021 - 2022 Meets Department Set Standard?
CISA 126 84.6% (N=13) 85.7% (N=7) 84.4% (N=32) 84.90% 83.1% - 86.7% * 73.3% (N=30) No
CISA 127 100.0% (N=10) 100.0% (N=3) 84.0% (N=25) 94.70% 71.7% - 117.6% * 67.9% (N=28) No
CISA 160 53.5% (N=43) 68.8% (N=48) 63.5% (N=52) 61.90% 42.6% - 81.2% * 67.9% (N=53) Yes
CISA 305 59.4% (N=266) 58.0% (N=257) 44.5% (N=218) 54.00% 33.5% - 74.4% * 52.1% (N=194) Yes
CISA 306 69.2% (N=26) 46.2% (N=26) 76.5% (N=17) 64.00% 24.6% - 103.3% * 36.4% (N=11) Yes
CISA 308 84.5% (N=296) 74.7% (N=253) N/A 79.60% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISA 315 55.2% (N=440) 56.2% (N=509) 62.0% (N=761) 57.80% 48.7% - 67.0% * 62.9% (N=647) Yes
CISA 316 52.2% (N=46) 37.8% (N=45) 64.0% (N=25) 51.30% 18.7% - 83.9% * 61.5% (N=26) Yes
CISA 318 77.8% (N=275) 68.4% (N=256) N/A 73.10% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISA 320 76.0% (N=171) 50.8% (N=183) 72.0% (N=132) 66.30% 32.6% - 99.9% * 58.5% (N=123) Yes
CISA 322 91.7% (N=36) 80.0% (N=30) 84.6% (N=26) 85.40% 70.8% - 100.0% * 73.9% (N=23) Yes
CISA 330 76.4% (N=55) 63.2% (N=57) 60.5% (N=43) 66.70% 45.5% - 87.8% * 59.5% (N=37) Yes
CISA 340 59.8% (N=122) 56.1% (N=114) 50.0% (N=92) 55.30% 43.0% - 67.7% * 59.6% (N=94) Yes
CISA 345 75.0% (N=56) 63.6% (N=55) 80.4% (N=51) 73.00% 51.8% - 94.3% * 83.3% (N=42) Yes
CISA 346 61.9% (N=63) 63.1% (N=65) 59.6% (N=57) 61.50% 57.2% - 65.9% * 71.7% (N=53) Yes, and exceeds Stretch Goal
CISC 100 27.8% (N=18) N/A N/A 27.80% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISC 300 67.9% (N=84) 55.8% (N=86) N/A 61.80% N/A - N/A * 60.0% (N=5) N/A
CISC 305 75.2% (N=117) 85.3% (N=116) 87.2% (N=109) 82.60% 66.6% - 98.6% * 78.8% (N=85) Yes
CISC 306 64.2% (N=53) 65.5% (N=58) 77.4% (N=62) 69.00% 50.9% - 87.2% * 67.4% (N=46) Yes
CISC 308 74.3% (N=210) 64.8% (N=71) N/A 69.50% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISC 310 72.8% (N=302) 76.1% (N=268) 73.2% (N=317) 74.10% 69.6% - 78.5% * 70.4% (N=314) Yes
CISC 320 72.7% (N=172) 68.6% (N=172) 70.7% (N=123) 70.70% 65.6% - 75.7% * 59.1% (N=115) No
CISC 323 80.0% (N=85) 75.0% (N=84) 59.6% (N=104) 71.50% 45.1% - 97.9% * 53.5% (N=99) Yes
CISC 324 84.4% (N=45) 54.0% (N=50) 47.9% (N=48) 62.10% 13.5% - 110.7% * 57.1% (N=56) Yes
CISC 350 72.2% (N=79) 75.0% (N=60) 87.9% (N=58) 78.40% 57.5% - 99.3% * 78.0% (N=59) Yes
CISC 351 49.2% (N=59) 56.4% (N=39) 72.2% (N=54) 59.30% 30.0% - 88.6% * 74.5% (N=55) Yes
CISC 361 76.8% (N=69) 52.6% (N=57) 82.7% (N=81) 70.70% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISC 362 73.3% (N=15) 77.8% (N=9) N/A 75.60% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISC 363 84.8% (N=46) 60.0% (N=10) 77.8% (N=36) 74.20% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISC 498 66.7% (N=3) 33.3% (N=3) 60.0% (N=5) 53.30% 9.5% - 97.2% * 100.0% (N=2) Yes, and exceeds Stretch Goal
CISC 499 N/A N/A 100.0% (N=5) 100.00% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISN 110 52.7% (N=129) 59.7% (N=62) 65.7% (N=67) 59.40% 43.2% - 75.5% * 77.6% (N=67) Yes, and exceeds Stretch Goal
CISN 111 77.8% (N=54) 63.5% (N=52) 81.8% (N=44) 74.40% 50.4% - 98.3% * 76.9% (N=39) Yes
CISN 119 68.6% (N=70) 72.2% (N=72) 74.5% (N=55) 71.80% 64.3% - 79.3% * 79.2% (N=24) Yes
CISN 140 89.5% (N=19) 80.0% (N=25) 75.6% (N=41) 81.70% 64.1% - 99.3% * 81.1% (N=53) Yes
CISN 141 82.4% (N=17) 77.8% (N=18) 57.1% (N=28) 72.40% 39.1% - 105.8% * 57.1% (N=35) Yes
CISN 142 86.7% (N=15) 92.3% (N=13) 63.2% (N=19) 80.70% 42.3% - 119.1% * 70.6% (N=17) Yes
CISN 143 86.7% (N=15) 91.7% (N=12) 90.9% (N=11) 89.70% 83.1% - 96.4% * 100.0% (N=10) Yes, and exceeds Stretch Goal
CISN 300 86.9% (N=61) 81.4% (N=70) 74.2% (N=62) 80.80% 65.0% - 96.7% * 73.6% (N=72) Yes
CISN 302 79.6% (N=49) 80.4% (N=46) 73.1% (N=26) 77.70% 67.7% - 87.7% * 69.2% (N=26) Yes
CISN 307 89.3% (N=28) 90.0% (N=30) 87.5% (N=32) 88.90% 85.7% - 92.1% * 80.0% (N=25) No
CISN 308 68.0% (N=25) 63.0% (N=27) 70.0% (N=10) 67.00% 58.0% - 76.0% * 81.8% (N=11) Yes, and exceeds Stretch Goal
CISP 300 57.9% (N=401) 40.8% (N=422) 56.2% (N=395) 51.60% 28.2% - 75.0% * 54.1% (N=425) Yes
CISP 310 84.1% (N=132) 71.4% (N=140) 45.8% (N=107) 67.10% 18.6% - 115.6% * 50.8% (N=120) Yes
CISP 350 72.1% (N=68) 68.7% (N=67) 61.3% (N=62) 67.30% 53.7% - 81.0% * 75.0% (N=56) Yes
CISP 360 62.2% (N=278) 53.7% (N=242) 67.7% (N=189) 61.20% 43.7% - 78.8% * 79.8% (N=163) Yes, and exceeds Stretch Goal
CISP 362 46.2% (N=13) N/A N/A 46.20% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISP 370 57.4% (N=54) 72.3% (N=47) 64.5% (N=62) 64.80% 46.2% - 83.3% * 65.2% (N=46) Yes
CISP 371 62.5% (N=8) N/A N/A 62.50% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISP 400 63.8% (N=174) 57.5% (N=160) 51.6% (N=93) 57.60% 42.5% - 72.8% * 67.7% (N=93) Yes
CISP 401 64.6% (N=65) 67.2% (N=58) 80.6% (N=62) 70.80% 49.5% - 92.2% * 51.7% (N=60) Yes
CISP 430 71.9% (N=128) 64.5% (N=124) 82.0% (N=128) 72.80% 51.0% - 94.7% * 89.6% (N=115) Yes
CISP 440 66.0% (N=103) 70.2% (N=104) 66.7% (N=60) 67.60% 62.0% - 73.2% * 65.0% (N=60) Yes
CISP 480 66.7% (N=12) N/A 70.0% (N=10) 68.30% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISP 499 N/A N/A 100.0% (N=6) 100.00% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISS 300 80.8% (N=73) 76.8% (N=56) 71.9% (N=32) 76.50% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISS 310 80.6% (N=67) 70.9% (N=110) 78.1% (N=160) 76.50% 64.0% - 89.0% * 71.3% (N=136) Yes
CISS 325 90.6% (N=32) N/A N/A 90.60% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISS 341 N/A 69.2% (N=52) 94.1% (N=34) 81.70% N/A - N/A * N/A N/A
CISS 342 62.1% (N=29) 57.7% (N=52) 62.1% (N=29) 60.60% 54.3% - 66.9% * 84.2% (N=19) Yes, and exceeds Stretch Goal
CISS 350 53.2% (N=47) 47.4% (N=38) 86.0% (N=43) 62.20% 10.4% - 114.0% * 87.3% (N=71) Yes
CISS 360 56.7% (N=30) 54.8% (N=31) 86.1% (N=36) 65.90% 22.3% - 109.5% * 80.0% (N=35) Yes
CISW 300 81.7% (N=60) 70.9% (N=55) 77.4% (N=53) 76.60% 63.2% - 90.1% * 66.7% (N=63) Yes
CISW 321 71.4% (N=28) 64.3% (N=28) 64.0% (N=25) 66.60% 56.1% - 77.0% * 72.7% (N=22) Yes
CISW 350 83.3% (N=54) 73.2% (N=56) 78.6% (N=56) 78.40% 65.8% - 90.9% * 75.7% (N=37) Yes
CISW 355 N/A N/A 86.2% (N=29) 86.20% N/A - N/A * 100.0% (N=10) N/A
CISW 370 N/A N/A 82.6% (N=23) 82.60% N/A - N/A * 81.8% (N=11) N/A
CISW 410 N/A 88.9% (N=9) N/A 88.90% N/A - N/A * 44.4% (N=18) N/A
Download PDF