American River College Integrated Planning System Reports
2022 Disproportionate Impact for Computer Information Science Overall Drop Rate Metric (F19-S22)
The following is intended to provide an overview of where disproportionate impact (DI) exists in the Drop Rates (% W notations) of different racial/ethnic groups within your planning unit. Greater detail can be found in the Department DI Detail Spreadsheets which are available for each of the course designators in your department
(CISA, CISC, CISN, CISP, CISS, CISW).
These nine-tab spreadsheets show your DI data at the department and course level, disaggregated by race, gender, and gender within race. (To protect the identity of faculty, DI statistics are provided only for courses that have been taught by at least three faculty members during the three years we merge for these reports. An unrestricted report may be obtained if all of a planning unit’s faculty are agreeable, and doing so typically results in DI data being reported for additional courses beyond those shown in the restricted version of the reports.)
Please refer to ARC’s DI Interpretation Guide for assistance in understanding and differentiating between ARC’s two DI reports (the web-based report shown here and the Dept DI Detail Spreadsheet(s), linked above)
Course
African/ American
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic/ Latino
Multi- Race
Native/ American
Other/ Non-White
Pacific/ Islander
White
Unknown
CISA 126
CISA 127
CISA 160
CISA 305
CISA 306
CISA 308
CISA 315
CISA 316
CISA 318
CISA 320
CISA 322
CISA 330
CISA 340
CISA 345
CISA 346
CISC 300
CISC 305
CISC 306
CISC 308
CISC 310
CISC 320
CISC 323
CISC 324
CISC 331
CISC 332
CISC 350
CISC 351
CISC 361
CISC 362
CISC 363
CISC 498
CISC 499
CISN 110
CISN 111
CISN 119
CISN 140
CISN 141
CISN 142
CISN 143
CISN 300
CISN 302
CISN 307
CISN 308
CISP 300
CISP 310
CISP 332
CISP 350
CISP 360
CISP 370
CISP 400
CISP 401
CISP 430
CISP 440
CISP 480
CISP 499
CISS 300
CISS 310
CISS 315
CISS 316
CISS 330
CISS 341
CISS 342
CISS 350
CISS 360
CISW 300
CISW 321
CISW 350
CISW 355
CISW 370
CISW 410
The Disproportionate Impact methodology shown here reflects the four different methodologies recommended by the State Chancellor's Office,
including the most recent, the Percentage Point Gap Methodology with Margin of Error. Applied to the success rates of the courses your unit has offered over
the last three years, the above table shows the following:
Groups with success rates showing Definite DI
Groups with success rates showing Potential DI (rates within 3 points of the group’s DI threshold)
Groups with success rates that may possibly have DI, but for which too little data exists to be sure (<10)
Groups with success rates showing No Measurable DI