American River College Integrated Planning System Reports
2021 Disproportionate Impact for Sacramento Regional Public Safety Training Center Overall Drop Rate Metric (F18-S21)
The following is intended to provide an overview of where disproportionate impact (DI) exists in the Drop Rates (% W notations) of different racial/ethnic groups within your planning unit. Greater detail can be found in the Department DI Detail Spreadsheets which are available for each of the course designators in your department
(PSTC).
These nine-tab spreadsheets show your DI data at the department and course level, disaggregated by race, gender, and gender within race. (To protect the identity of faculty, DI statistics are provided only for courses that have been taught by at least three faculty members during the three years we merge for these reports. An unrestricted report may be obtained if all of a planning unit’s faculty are agreeable, and doing so typically results in DI data being reported for additional courses beyond those shown in the restricted version of the reports.)
Please refer to ARC’s DI Interpretation Guide for assistance in understanding and differentiating between ARC’s two DI reports (the web-based report shown here and the Dept DI Detail Spreadsheet(s), linked above)
Course
African/ American
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic/ Latino
Multi- Race
Native/ American
Other/ Non-White
Pacific/ Islander
White
Unknown
PSTC 1251
PSTC 1270
PSTC 1273
PSTC 1403
PSTC 1500
PSTC 1501
PSTC 1502
PSTC 1503
PSTC 1504
PSTC 1505
PSTC 1506
PSTC 1507
PSTC 1514
PSTC 1517
PSTC 1520
PSTC 1521
PSTC 1533
PSTC 1542
PSTC 1555
PSTC 1571
PSTC 1572
PSTC 1573
PSTC 1602
PSTC 1603
PSTC 1604
PSTC 1621
PSTC 1622
PSTC 1640
PSTC 1645
PSTC 1650
PSTC 1651
PSTC 1660
PSTC 1661
PSTC 1662
PSTC 1663
PSTC 1683
PSTC 1684
PSTC 1720
PSTC 1722
PSTC 1760
PSTC 1761
PSTC 1780
PSTC 1781
PSTC 1787
PSTC 1800
PSTC 1801
PSTC 1804
PSTC 1812
PSTC 1813
PSTC 1814
PSTC 1852
PSTC 1874
PSTC 1900
The Disproportionate Impact methodology shown here reflects the four different methodologies recommended by the State Chancellor's Office,
including the most recent, the Percentage Point Gap Methodology with Margin of Error. Applied to the success rates of the courses your unit has offered over
the last three years, the above table shows the following:
Groups with success rates showing Definite DI
Groups with success rates showing Potential DI (rates within 3 points of the group’s DI threshold)
Groups with success rates that may possibly have DI, but for which too little data exists to be sure (<10)
Groups with success rates showing No Measurable DI