Skip to Content

American River College Integrated Planning System Reports

2022 Disproportionate Impact for Chemistry Overall
Drop Rate Metric (F19-S22)

The following is intended to provide an overview of where disproportionate impact (DI) exists in the Drop Rates (% W notations) of different racial/ethnic groups within your planning unit. Greater detail can be found in the Department DI Detail Spreadsheets which are available for each of the course designators in your department (CHEM). These nine-tab spreadsheets show your DI data at the department and course level, disaggregated by race, gender, and gender within race. (To protect the identity of faculty, DI statistics are provided only for courses that have been taught by at least three faculty members during the three years we merge for these reports. An unrestricted report may be obtained if all of a planning unit’s faculty are agreeable, and doing so typically results in DI data being reported for additional courses beyond those shown in the restricted version of the reports.)

Please refer to ARC’s DI Interpretation Guide for assistance in understanding and differentiating between ARC’s two DI reports (the web-based report shown here and the Dept DI Detail Spreadsheet(s), linked above)

Course African/
American
Asian Filipino Hispanic/
Latino
Multi-
Race
Native/
American
Other/
Non-White
Pacific/
Islander
White Unknown
CHEM 130 yellow yellow yellow green yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
CHEM 305 red green green red green yellow yellow green green green
CHEM 306 yellow green green green green yellow yellow yellow green yellow
CHEM 309 red green green green green yellow yellow yellow green yellow
CHEM 310 red green green red green yellow yellow yellow green red
CHEM 400 red green green lightred P green yellow yellow yellow green green
CHEM 401 green green green green green yellow yellow yellow green red
CHEM 420 green green green lightred P green yellow yellow yellow green yellow
CHEM 421 yellow green yellow red green yellow yellow yellow green yellow
CHEM 423 yellow green yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
CHEM 495 yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow
CHEM 83 yellow yellow yellow red yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
CHEM 84 yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow
CHEM 86 yellow green yellow green yellow yellow yellow yellow green yellow
CHEM 87 yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow yellow red yellow

The Disproportionate Impact methodology shown here reflects the four different methodologies recommended by the State Chancellor's Office, including the most recent, the Percentage Point Gap Methodology with Margin of Error. Applied to the success rates of the courses your unit has offered over the last three years, the above table shows the following:

  • red     Groups with success rates showing Definite DI
  • lightred P     Groups with success rates showing Potential DI (rates within 3 points of the group’s DI threshold)
  • yellow     Groups with success rates that may possibly have DI, but for which too little data exists to be sure (<10)
  • green     Groups with success rates showing No Measurable DI

Download PDF