American River College Integrated Planning System Reports
2022 Disproportionate Impact for English Overall A_B Rate Metric (F19-S22)
The following is intended to provide an overview of where disproportionate impact (DI) exists in the A-B Rates (% A,B grades) of different racial/ethnic groups within your planning unit. Greater detail can be found in the Department DI Detail Spreadsheets which are available for each of the course designators in your department
(ENGCW, ENGED, ENGLT, ENGRD, ENGWR).
These nine-tab spreadsheets show your DI data at the department and course level, disaggregated by race, gender, and gender within race. (To protect the identity of faculty, DI statistics are provided only for courses that have been taught by at least three faculty members during the three years we merge for these reports. An unrestricted report may be obtained if all of a planning unit’s faculty are agreeable, and doing so typically results in DI data being reported for additional courses beyond those shown in the restricted version of the reports.)
Please refer to ARC’s DI Interpretation Guide for assistance in understanding and differentiating between ARC’s two DI reports (the web-based report shown here and the Dept DI Detail Spreadsheet(s), linked above)
Course
African/ American
Asian
Filipino
Hispanic/ Latino
Multi- Race
Native/ American
Other/ Non-White
Pacific/ Islander
White
Unknown
ENGCW 400
ENGCW 410
ENGCW 415
ENGCW 420
ENGCW 430
ENGCW 441
ENGCW 450
ENGCW 455
ENGCW 495
ENGED 305
ENGED 320
ENGED 324
ENGLT 300
ENGLT 304
ENGLT 308
ENGLT 310
ENGLT 311
ENGLT 320
ENGLT 321
ENGLT 327
ENGLT 330
ENGLT 335
ENGLT 340
ENGLT 341
ENGLT 345
ENGLT 360
ENGLT 365
ENGLT 378
ENGLT 380
ENGLT 392
ENGLT 403
ENGLT 486
ENGRD 111
ENGRD 116
ENGRD 15
ENGRD 310
ENGRD 314
ENGRD 315
ENGRD 316
ENGWR 101
ENGWR 300
ENGWR 301
ENGWR 302
ENGWR 303
ENGWR 306
ENGWR 361
ENGWR 362
ENGWR 480
ENGWR 481
ENGWR 482
ENGWR 94
ENGWR 95
ENGWR 96
The Disproportionate Impact methodology shown here reflects the four different methodologies recommended by the State Chancellor's Office,
including the most recent, the Percentage Point Gap Methodology with Margin of Error. Applied to the success rates of the courses your unit has offered over
the last three years, the above table shows the following:
Groups with success rates showing Definite DI
Groups with success rates showing Potential DI (rates within 3 points of the group’s DI threshold)
Groups with success rates that may possibly have DI, but for which too little data exists to be sure (<10)
Groups with success rates showing No Measurable DI